Learnability issues in the acquisition of the dative alternation in English
Digital Document
Document
Handle |
Handle
http://hdl.handle.net/11134/20002:860737933
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Persons |
Persons
Creator (cre): Hammouda, Safinaz M.
Major Advisor (mja): Crain, Stephen
Associate Advisor (asa): Lasnik, Howard
Associate Advisor (asa): Michaels, David
|
||||||
Title |
Title
Title
Learnability issues in the acquisition of the dative alternation in English
|
||||||
Origin Information |
Origin Information
|
||||||
Parent Item |
Parent Item
|
||||||
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
||||||
Digital Origin |
Digital Origin
reformatted digital
|
||||||
Description |
Description
This dissertation provides a model of the learnability of datives, as in Mary gave a book to John / Mary gave John a book. Two general approaches are examined: The first approach holds that speakers have a dative rule which relate the two sentences above. The other approach holds that speakers learn the dative item- by-item. Rule-based studies of dativization have proposed several characterizations of the dative rule. These characterizations, however, have to treat many cases as exceptions. It is argued that, from a learnability perspective, lexical exceptions pose potential problems for the rule-based approach. One problem is that it is not clear how children would know these exceptions; another, is how they would achieve the adult grammar. The lexical-listing approach, on the other hand, is inadequate on empirical grounds, since children overgeneralize, suggesting some kind of a production process. I propose to modify the lexical-listing approach (Baker, 1979) to handle the problem of overgeralization. Essentially, the present proposal explains children's overgeneralization as the result of “performance economy,” rather than the product of an internalized rule of grammar. According to this view, both child and adult speakers are led by a general tendency to choose a reduced form over an expanded form (cf. Chomsky's, 1981 Avoid Pronoun Principle). (In the case of dative, the double-object form is taken to be a reduced form of the to dative form.) To explains how children “unlearn” overgeneralization, the present proposal invokes a form of indirect negative evidence (Chomsky, 1981). This proposal is supported by three experiments. The experiments elicit grammaticality judgments from adult speakers and from children between 4 and 6 years of age. The findings indicate that children accept verbs in the double-object form which are not accepted by adults. The findings also reveal that adults vary on their judgments on what is characterized in the literature as report-type verbs. These findings are explained under the learning model proposed.
|
||||||
Genre |
Genre
|
||||||
Organizations |
Organizations
Degree granting institution (dgg): University of Connecticut
|
||||||
Extent |
Extent
viii, 102 leaves, bound ; 28 cm
|
||||||
Held By | |||||||
Use and Reproduction |
Use and Reproduction
These Materials are provided for educational and research purposes only.
|
||||||
Degree Name |
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy
|
||||||
Degree Level |
Degree Level
Doctoral
|
||||||
Degree Discipline |
Degree Discipline
Linguistics
|
||||||
Local Identifier |
Local Identifier
39153002509927
19852789
ASC Thesis 7621
|
May contain sensitive language or subject matter
See CTDA's Statement on Sensitive Content.
6
views
No downloadable files available for this item.